Why did Mahua Moitra drop media houses from the defamation suit in the cash for query row
Reason behind Mahua Moitra's decision to drop media houses from the defamation suit
Mahua Moitra's decision to drop media houses from the defamation suit in the cash for query row can be attributed to the following reasons:
- Lack of substantial evidence: Moitra may have realized that there was insufficient evidence to directly link the media houses to the alleged defamation. Dropping them from the lawsuit would prevent unnecessary legal battles and focus on protagonists involved.
- Changing legal strategy: Moitra may have decided to alter her legal strategy by focusing on the main individuals involved in the 'cash for query' scandal. By dropping the media houses, she could potentially concentrate on proving the involvement of specific individuals without diluting her case.
- Public opinion: Moitra may have taken into consideration the potential backlash from the public and media if she pursued legal action against media houses. By removing them from the defamation suit, she might avoid unnecessary negative publicity and maintain a better public image.
- Legal costs and time: Litigation against media houses can be financially and time-consuming. Dropping the media houses may have been a strategic move to save time, money, and effort by narrowing the scope of the case and focusing on more critical aspects.
Answered
a year ago