Why did India abstain from the call for truce
Why did India abstain from the call for truce? | Explained
India abstained from the call for truce for various reasons:
- Regional stability: India considered the situation and dynamics in the region and believed that a truce might not lead to a long-term resolution of the conflict.
- Unilateral ceasefire violations: India accused the other party of consistently violating previous ceasefires, undermining any trust in a potential truce. They believed that without a strong commitment to abide by the truce, it would not be effective.
- Need for comprehensive solution: India favored a comprehensive resolution of the conflict rather than a temporary truce. They believed that addressing the root causes of the conflict and engaging in meaningful dialogue would lead to a more sustainable peace.
- Self-defense and national interests: India prioritized the protection of its own security and the interests of its people. They believed that abstaining from the truce call would provide them with the flexibility to respond to any potential threats or acts of aggression.
- Previously unsuccessful truces: India might have considered the historical context of failed truces and the resumption of hostilities. They might have felt that abstaining was a more pragmatic approach.
Answered
a year ago