Why did courts revisit bar on sub-quotas
An analysis of the legal aspects and reasons behind the reconsideration of sub-quotas by the courts
- Legal scrutiny: Courts revisited the bar on sub-quotas due to legal challenges questioning the constitutionality of such sub-quotas.
- Evolving jurisprudence: The judicial interpretation of equality and affirmative action evolved over time, prompting a reevaluation of sub-quotas.
- Accuracy and fairness: Courts examined whether sub-quotas effectively promote inclusivity and fairness in the distribution of benefits and opportunities.
- Merit vs. diversity: The balance between merit-based selection and diversity goals was deliberated, affecting the reconsideration of sub-quotas.
- Alignment with policy goals: Courts assessed whether sub-quotas align with broader policy objectives of addressing historical discrimination and promoting social justice.
Answered
9 months ago