Why did activists claim that a local bureaucrat abetted the boycott of a Dalit ration shop owner
Activists argue that a local bureaucrat played a role in encouraging the boycott of a Dalit ration shop owner.
- Discrimination: Activists claim that the local bureaucrat played a role in abetting the boycott of the Dalit ration shop owner due to deep-rooted discrimination. Dalits, also known as 'untouchables,' face social marginalization and are often subjected to caste-based discrimination in India.
- Caste-based prejudices: The boycott could have been fueled by caste-based prejudices, perpetuated by dominant caste communities who hold economic and social power. The bureaucrat, who is also a member of the dominant caste, may have allowed or even encouraged the boycott to maintain the existing power dynamics.
- Collusion: Activists allege collusion between the bureaucrat and members of the dominant caste in the area, who may have conspired to boycott the Dalit ration shop owner. This collusion could have been motivated by a desire to maintain their economic control over the community and suppress economic mobility among Dalits.
- Political influence: The local bureaucrat may have had political influence or connections, enabling them to sway public opinion and influence the actions of others. Activists argue that this influence was potentially used to instigate and perpetuate the boycott against the Dalit ration shop owner.
- Denial of rights: The activists claim that the bureaucrat's actions violated the rights of the Dalit ration shop owner to conduct their business freely and without discrimination. By abetting the boycott, the bureaucrat potentially denied the Dalit individual the opportunity for economic upliftment and equal participation in society.
Answered
a year ago