Why are media bodies calling for norms on interrogation of journalists after the NewsClick raids
NewsClick raids | Media bodies write to CJI, call for norms on interrogation of journalists
Media bodies are calling for norms on the interrogation of journalists in the wake of the NewsClick raids for several reasons:
- Protection of freedom of press: Interrogating journalists can potentially hinder their ability to report freely and fearlessly. Media bodies argue that establishing norms will safeguard the freedom of the press, allowing journalists to carry out their duties without fear of undue intimidation or harassment.
- Prevent misuse of power: Norms on the interrogation process can help prevent the misuse of power by authorities. They can ensure that journalists are only questioned when necessary, based on legitimate concerns, rather than used as a means to suppress dissent or control the media.
- Transparency and accountability: Establishing norms will promote transparency and accountability within the interrogation process. Media bodies emphasize the importance of clear guidelines, oversight mechanisms, and adherence to due process to prevent arbitrary actions against journalists.
- International standards: Media bodies argue that norms on the interrogation of journalists should align with international standards and best practices. This includes respecting freedom of expression, protecting the confidentiality of sources, and upholding the rights of journalists during questioning.
- Maintaining public trust: By establishing norms, media bodies aim to maintain the public's trust in the media. They believe that ensuring proper treatment of journalists during interrogations will enhance credibility and reinforce the importance of a free and independent press in democratic societies.
Answered
a year ago