The Supreme Court criticized the Gujarat High Court for its 'counterblast' in the abortion case. Here are the key points of the criticism:

• The Supreme Court expressed its disappointment with the High Court's approach, stating that it seemed like a 'counterblast' to the earlier ruling by the apex court.
• The criticism pertained to the High Court's decision to deny permission for abortion to a 14-year-old rape survivor who was 24 weeks pregnant, despite previous clear guidelines by the Supreme Court allowing for such cases to be considered on humanitarian grounds.
• The Supreme Court held that the High Court's decision ignored the rights and the physical and mental well-being of the minor girl, thereby failing to protect her interests.
• It was observed that the High Court did not take into account relevant factors and proper medical opinions while making its decision.
• Furthermore, the Supreme Court admonished the High Court for not considering the global medical advancements and jurisprudence surrounding abortion rights, which should have been taken into account in this case.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court criticized the Gujarat High Court for its 'counterblast' approach, emphasizing that the decision failed to protect the rights and welfare of the minor girl involved in the abortion case.