What is the significance of the Supreme Court's statement regarding absconding and guilt

The Supreme Court's statement regarding the connection between absconding and guilt is significant for several reasons: 1. Reliability of evidence: The court highlights that absconding can be considered as a strong indicator of guilt. When a person flees or goes into hiding to avoid arrest or trial, it raises doubts about their innocence and raises questions about the reliability of evidence against them. 2. Presumption against the accused: The statement reinforces the legal principle of 'innocent until proven guilty.' However, the court emphasizes that absconding can shift the burden of proof to the accused to establish their innocence, as it creates a presumption against them. 3. Fair administration of justice: By establishing the connection between absconding and guilt, the court seeks to ensure a fair administration of justice by preventing individuals from evading accountability and avoiding trial by simply fleeing. 4. Judicial discretion: The court acknowledges that each case is unique, and the judge must exercise discretion in assessing the circumstances surrounding the accused's decision to abscond and determine its evidentiary value in the particular case. Overall, the Supreme Court's statement highlights the significance of absconding as a relevant factor in determining guilt, ensuring fairness in the legal process, and upholding the rule of law.