The significance of the Delhi government's move to quash an ordinance that gives control over services to the L-G can be explained as follows: 1. Asserting jurisdiction: This move signifies the Delhi government's attempt to assert its jurisdiction and control over matters related to services within the state. By quashing this ordinance, the government aims to regain authority over the functioning of the services department. 2. Power struggle: The move highlights the ongoing power struggle between the Lieutenant Governor (L-G) and the elected government in Delhi. It showcases the government's resistance to what it perceives as encroachment on its powers by the L-G. 3. Administrative efficiency: The government believes that it will be able to improve administrative efficiency by bringing control over services under its purview. This move is seen as an attempt to streamline decision-making and ensure better governance. 4. Constitutional interpretation: The quashing of the ordinance raises questions about the interpretation of the constitutional provisions governing the governance structure in the National Capital Territory. It brings attention to the need for clarity and consensus on the roles and responsibilities of different branches of the government. 5. Legal and political ramifications: This move is likely to lead to legal and political battles between the Delhi government and the central government. The verdict of the courts on this matter will have implications for the distribution of powers between the state and central governments. Overall, the quashing of the ordinance by the Delhi government signifies its determination to assert its authority and protect its powers in matters of governance, leading to broader discussions on the nature of federalism in India.