What is the response of the DGP to the Ayodhya temple live telecast case in Supreme Court
The response of the DGP in Supreme Court regarding the Ayodhya temple live telecast case is seen as an attempt to portray the Tamil Nadu Government as 'anti-Hindu'.
The DGP's response in the Ayodhya temple live telecast case in the Supreme Court has been seen by some as an attempt to portray the Tamil Nadu Government as 'anti-Hindu'. Here are the key points:
- The DGP, in his response, opposed the live telecast of the Ayodhya temple proceedings in Tamil Nadu, expressing concerns over potential law and order issues that could arise due to the sensitive nature of the case.
- He argued that live telecast could incite communal tensions and disrupt public order, considering the emotional attachment of the people to the Ayodhya issue.
- The response was met with criticism from supporters of live telecast, who accused the DGP and the state government of trying to suppress transparency and favoring a particular religious group.
- Some claimed that the DGP's stance was politically motivated and aimed at appeasing a particular section of voters.
- This response sparked a debate on the balance between freedom of expression and maintaining law and order in sensitive cases.
- The Supreme Court is yet to make a final decision on the live telecast of the Ayodhya temple case.
Answered
a year ago