• The Supreme Court is currently hearing multiple petitions challenging the abrogation of Article 370 of the Indian Constitution.
• The petitions argue that the abrogation was unconstitutional as it was done without the approval of the Jammu and Kashmir state legislature.
• The Court initially heard arguments on the constitutionality of the abrogation, focusing on whether it required the consent of the state legislature or not.
• Several parties, including the Central government, have argued that the President has the power to make changes to Jammu and Kashmir's special status under the Constitution.
• The Court has also been examining the impact and consequences of the abrogation on the rights of the people of Jammu and Kashmir.
• The hearings have included the consideration of issues such as the restoration of internet services, the detention of individuals, and the overall security situation in the region.
• The Court has sought responses from the government on various aspects related to the abrogation and has adjourned the case to allow for further arguments.

Please note that the ongoing hearings and their outcomes are subject to change, and it is advisable to refer to official sources for the most up-to-date information.