What does the Supreme Court's history of rulings on 'onerous' conditions and gag orders suggest for future cases like Ranveer Allahbadia's

1. The Supreme Court's history of rulings on 'onerous' conditions and gag orders shows a commitment to protecting individual rights and freedoms. 2. Past decisions indicate that the Court is likely to carefully scrutinize any restrictions placed on individuals, especially those that impede freedom of expression. 3. The Court may consider the balance between the right to free speech and any compelling reasons for imposing restrictions. 4. Precedents suggest that the Court may intervene if it deems a gag order or onerous condition to be unjust or unconstitutional. 5. Ranveer Allahbadia's case is likely to be considered in light of these principles, with a focus on upholding fundamental rights while also addressing any legitimate concerns raised.