gswith
Login
No Answers

What challenges might arise when forming a Joint Parliamentary Committee to examine bills seeking to remove the PM and CMs?

I am curious about the procedural, political, and constitutional obstacles that could delay or complicate the formation of such a committee in Parliament.
parliament
committees
polity
Forming a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) to examine bills related to the removal of the Prime Minister (PM) and Chief Ministers (CMs) involves several complex challenges. These challenges can be procedural, political, and constitutional in nature, given the sensitive implications for the executive branch and the federal structure of India.
  • Procedural Challenges:
    • The formation of a JPC requires a motion to be passed in one House and agreed upon by the other, which can be time-consuming and contentious.
    • Deciding the composition and mandate of the JPC can lead to disagreements among parties, especially regarding proportional representation and leadership of the committee.
    • There may be procedural delays if members raise points of order or objections about the admissibility of the bill or the scope of the committee.
  • Political Challenges:
    • Bills seeking to remove the PM or CMs are highly sensitive and politically charged, leading to strong opposition or support along party lines, making consensus on forming a JPC difficult.
    • Ruling parties may perceive such bills as direct threats to their leadership and may use their majority to block or delay the formation of the committee.
    • Regional parties may have differing views, especially concerning the removal of CMs, complicating the process further.
  • Constitutional Challenges:
    • The Constitution of India lays down specific procedures for the removal of the PM and CMs (e.g., through a vote of no confidence), and any bill seeking to alter these provisions may face questions about its constitutionality.
    • There may be legal challenges regarding whether Parliament has the authority to legislate on the removal of CMs, as this touches upon the federal structure and powers of state legislatures.
    • The President or the Governor may also be required to give assent to such bills, which could lead to further constitutional scrutiny and delays.
Answered 2 weeks ago
Rahul Aspirants