What are the SOP non-compliance issues faced by the Aurangabad Bench of Bombay HC in cases of sexual offences
Aurangabad Bench of Bombay HC expresses unhappiness over SOP non-compliance in evidence collection and preservation in cases of sexual offences.
The Aurangabad Bench of Bombay High Court has raised concerns over the non-compliance of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) in evidence collection and preservation in cases of sexual offences. The following are the key non-compliance issues highlighted:
- Evidence Collection: The court expressed discontent over the lack of adherence to proper procedures in collecting evidence, which includes medical examination reports, DNA samples, and forensic evidence. These discrepancies can potentially undermine the integrity of the collected evidence.
- Evidence Preservation: The court pointed out that there were failures in ensuring the proper preservation of evidence, such as CCTV footage, digital evidence, and exhibits. This could jeopardize the accuracy and reliability of the evidence during the trial.
- SOP Implementation: The court emphasized the need for strict adherence to prescribed SOPs by investigating agencies and other relevant authorities. This is crucial to maintain consistency and ensure the fair administration of justice.
- Training and Awareness: The court highlighted the importance of training and creating awareness among investigators, forensic experts, and other stakeholders involved in handling sexual offence cases. Proper training can enhance competency and improve compliance with SOPs.
Answered
a year ago