What are the possible impacts of MPs bringing a motion against a judge in Parliament on the independence of the judiciary?

The independence of the judiciary is a fundamental feature of the Indian Constitution, ensuring that judges can make decisions free from external pressures. When Members of Parliament (MPs) bring a motion against a judge, especially under the process for impeachment or removal, it can have several implications on the judiciary’s functioning and its perceived independence.

• Pressure on Judges: Frequent or politically-motivated motions may create an environment of fear or caution among judges, potentially influencing their judicial decisions to avoid legislative backlash.
• Threat to Judicial Independence: If the process is misused, it could undermine the separation of powers and allow the legislature to exert undue influence over the judiciary, affecting its autonomy.
• Public Perception: Such actions might erode public trust in the judiciary if they are seen as attempts to intimidate or punish judges for unpopular or adverse judgments.
• Checks and Balances: While the process is intended as a check against judicial misconduct, misuse can disturb the balance between the organs of government.
• Judicial Morale: The prospect of facing motions in Parliament may lower the morale of judges and affect their willingness to take bold or impartial decisions.
• Judicial Accountability vs. Independence: While accountability is important, excessive legislative interference can blur the line and threaten the core principle of judicial independence.