What are the implications of the 'We 20' summit and its opposition to the G-20

The 'We 20' summit, which opposes the G-20, has several implications: 1. Global Civil Society Engagement: The summit underscores the voices of a diverse group of 70 organizations, representing civil society’s interests worldwide. It highlights the desire for more inclusive decision-making processes in global governance. 2. Alternative Perspective: The 'We 20' summit presents an alternative perspective to address global challenges. It seeks to address social, economic, and environmental concerns from a lens different from the G-20's usual policy approach. 3. Grassroots Empowerment: By organizing the summit, these grassroots organizations are empowered to mobilize and advocate for change on a global level. Through their participation, they demonstrate the potential for collective action and social movements. 4. Influence on Global Agenda: The 'We 20' summit puts pressure on the G-20 to acknowledge and engage with critical issues raised by civil society organizations. It can influence the global agenda by bringing attention to the topics that are important to the participating groups. 5. Increased Dialogue and Collaboration: The opposition summit opens avenues for dialogue and collaboration between the G-20 and these civil society groups. It encourages greater participation and cooperation in addressing global challenges, fostering a more inclusive and diverse decision-making process. Overall, the 'We 20' summit challenges the dominance of the G-20 and seeks to promote alternative solutions through increased engagement and collaboration between civil society and global decision-makers.