What are the implications of the Supreme Court's stance on immunity for lawmakers involved in corruption cases
Discuss the recent Supreme Court decision overriding a previous verdict in the 1998 JMM bribery case.
- The recent Supreme Court decision reiterates that lawmakers involved in corruption cases are not immune and can be prosecuted.
- It sets a crucial precedent that no one is above the law, including elected officials.
- The decision underscores the importance of upholding accountability and transparency in governance.
- It sends a strong message that corruption will not be tolerated in the Indian political system.
- This ruling strengthens the fight against corruption and serves as a deterrent to other public officials against engaging in corrupt practices.
Answered
a year ago