What are the implications of the Supreme Court's directive to stop referring trial courts as 'lower courts'

Supreme Court asks its registry to stop referring trial courts as 'lower courts'

The directive from the Supreme Court to stop referring trial courts as 'lower courts' has significant implications for the perception and recognition of these courts.
By eliminating the term 'lower courts', the directive aims to promote equality and eliminate any notion of hierarchy within the judicial system.
It emphasizes the importance of recognizing trial courts as distinct entities with their own jurisdiction and decision-making powers.
This move aims to enhance the dignity and status of trial courts, acknowledging their crucial role in upholding justice and ensuring access to justice for all.
It signifies a shift towards a more inclusive and egalitarian approach, suggesting that every court plays a vital role in the overall functioning of the judiciary.
The directive also seeks to foster greater respect and appreciation for the work done by trial courts, highlighting their contribution to the judicial process.
Overall, this move aims to reshape the narrative around trial courts and promote a more harmonious and cooperative relationship among all levels of the judiciary.

These are the implications of the Supreme Court's directive to stop referring trial courts as 'lower courts'.

Answered a year ago

Rahul Preparing for Civil Services