What are the implications of the Supreme Court's directive to stop referring trial courts as 'lower courts'
Supreme Court asks its registry to stop referring trial courts as 'lower courts'
- The directive from the Supreme Court to stop referring trial courts as 'lower courts' has significant implications for the perception and recognition of these courts.
- By eliminating the term 'lower courts', the directive aims to promote equality and eliminate any notion of hierarchy within the judicial system.
- It emphasizes the importance of recognizing trial courts as distinct entities with their own jurisdiction and decision-making powers.
- This move aims to enhance the dignity and status of trial courts, acknowledging their crucial role in upholding justice and ensuring access to justice for all.
- It signifies a shift towards a more inclusive and egalitarian approach, suggesting that every court plays a vital role in the overall functioning of the judiciary.
- The directive also seeks to foster greater respect and appreciation for the work done by trial courts, highlighting their contribution to the judicial process.
- Overall, this move aims to reshape the narrative around trial courts and promote a more harmonious and cooperative relationship among all levels of the judiciary.
Answered
a year ago