What are the implications of the Supreme Court's decision to refuse 'breathing time' for the convicts in the Bilkis Bano case in India

The Supreme Court's decision to refuse 'breathing time' for the convicts in the Bilkis Bano case in India has several implications: 1. Upholding justice: By refusing to grant 'breathing time' for surrender, the Supreme Court ensures that justice is delivered swiftly and without unnecessary delay. This sends a strong message that the court is committed to delivering prompt justice. 2. Deterrence: The refusal of 'breathing time' may serve as a deterrent for potential offenders, as it shows that the court will not tolerate any attempts to delay justice or evade its consequences. 3. Victim's rights: The decision emphasizes the importance of protecting and upholding the rights of the victim. Refusing 'breathing time' ensures that the victim's right to a timely resolution of the case is respected. 4. Legal precedent: The decision sets a legal precedent for future cases, indicating that delays in surrendering will not be tolerated. This could streamline the judicial process and prevent unnecessary delays in the future. Overall, the Supreme Court's decision in the Bilkis Bano case has significant implications for the administration of justice, deterrence, victim rights, and legal precedents.