Should tracking devices be used on prison inmates released on parole
The Centre has advised States to consider using tracking devices on prison inmates who are released on parole. Is this a necessary step to ensure public safety?
Using tracking devices on prison inmates released on parole can be a contentious issue with pros and cons to consider. Here are a few points to consider:
- Enhanced public safety: Tracking devices can provide real-time information on the whereabouts of parolees, enabling authorities to quickly respond if they are in violation of their parole conditions or if they pose a threat to public safety.
- Deterrence factor: The presence of tracking devices can act as a deterrent, discouraging parolees from engaging in criminal activities or violating their parole terms due to the fear of being easily located.
- Increased supervision: Tracking devices allow parole officers to monitor the movements of parolees more efficiently, reducing the need for constant physical surveillance and enabling officers to allocate resources effectively.
- Reduced reoffending rates: Studies have shown that the use of tracking devices can contribute to a lower rate of reoffending by providing increased accountability and discouraging parole violations, ultimately leading to better community safety.
- Privacy concerns: The use of tracking devices raises privacy concerns, as it involves constant monitoring and potentially infringes on the privacy rights of individuals. Balancing public safety and personal privacy is a crucial consideration.
- Cost implications: Implementing tracking devices requires financial investment for equipment, maintenance, and staff training. The cost-benefit analysis should be carefully assessed and weighed against the potential benefits gained.
Answered
a year ago