On what basis did the Supreme Court hold that transgender persons in heterosexual relationships have the right to marry under existing law

The Supreme Court's ruling on the rights of transgender persons in heterosexual relationships to marry is based on the following points:

• Equal Protection under the law: The Court held that denying transgender persons in heterosexual relationships the right to marry violates their right to equal protection under the law, as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. It emphasized that all individuals, regardless of their gender identity, should have the same fundamental right to marry the person of their choice.
• Gender Identity: The Court recognized transgender individuals and their gender identity as protected by the Constitution. It acknowledged that gender identity is an essential aspect of a person's self-definition and should not impede their right to marry. Thus, the Court highlighted that transgender individuals should not be treated differently or denied their right to marry solely based on their gender identity.
• Existing Law: The Court's ruling emphasized that transgender persons in heterosexual relationships should be entitled to the same legal protections and benefits as cisgender individuals in similar relationships. It held that existing laws on marriage should be interpreted inclusively to reflect the rights of transgender individuals.

Overall, the Supreme Court's analysis affirmed the equal rights of transgender persons in heterosexual relationships to marry under existing law, ensuring their right to equal protection and recognition of their gender identity.