In what ways can the Supreme Court ensure fairness and transparency when appointing trial judges for high-profile cases such as the coal scam?

In high-profile cases like the coal scam, the Supreme Court plays a crucial role in upholding the integrity of the judicial process. To ensure fairness and transparency in appointing trial judges, the Court adopts several mechanisms and principles aimed at maintaining impartiality and public confidence.

• Selection of Experienced Judges: The Supreme Court often appoints judges with proven integrity, experience, and an unblemished record to handle sensitive cases, reducing the risk of bias or external influence.
• Transparent Selection Process: The process of appointing a trial judge may be conducted in open court, with reasons for the selection sometimes placed on record, ensuring transparency in decision-making.
• Recusal from Conflict of Interest: Judges with any potential conflict of interest in the case are recused or not considered, maintaining impartiality in the proceedings.
• Direct Monitoring: In some cases, the Supreme Court directly monitors the progress of the trial, issuing periodic directions to ensure adherence to due process and prevent delays or interference.
• Fixed Tenure and Protection: The appointed judge may be given a fixed tenure for the duration of the case and protected from arbitrary transfers, ensuring continuity and independence.
• Public Accountability: The Supreme Court may make its orders and reasons for judicial appointments public, which helps build trust among the public regarding the fairness of the process.
• Guidelines and Precedents: The Court may follow established guidelines or set new precedents for future appointments in high-profile cases, promoting consistency and transparency.