How is the Modi government allegedly weakening the 2010 Act meant for protecting monuments and archaeological sites
The Congress party accuses the Modi government of attempting to weaken the 2010 Act that is meant for safeguarding monuments and archaeological sites. Analyze the measures taken by the government and their alleged impact.
The alleged weakening of the 2010 Act by the Modi government, as claimed by the Congress party, includes several measures that have raised concerns:
- Amendments to the Act: The government has proposed changes to the Act, which have been criticized for shifting decision-making powers from the expert bodies to the bureaucracy. This centralization of authority diminishes the role of experts in protecting monuments and archaeological sites.
- Reduced penalty provisions: The amendments also aim to reduce penalties for illegal construction or damage to monuments, undermining their protection. The lower penalties may fail to act as deterrents, potentially leading to increased encroachment and harm to heritage sites.
- Overriding concerns over development: The government's push for developmental projects, including infrastructure and tourism, has led to exemptions and dilution of certain regulations under the Act. This prioritization of development over conservation has the potential to compromise the safeguarding of monuments.
- Lack of transparency: Critics argue that the government has not adequately consulted with experts and stakeholders while making these changes. The opaque decision-making process raises questions about the sincerity of the government's commitment to upholding the Act.
- Raising doubts about intent: The cumulative impact of the government's measures has raised suspicions about its intent regarding heritage conservation. Opposition parties argue that the changes primarily benefit builders and developers, potentially leading to rampant commercialization and degradation of historical sites.
Answered
a year ago