There are several ways in which the use of technology can contradict the objective of MGNREGA in India. Congress leader Jairam Ramesh has argued that the overreliance on technology can nullify the purpose of MGNREGA. Some of the key points to consider are:

• Technology may not be accessible to all: MGNREGA is a scheme that aims to provide employment to the rural poor. However, in many parts of the country, technology is not easily accessible. This can lead to discrimination and exclusion.
• Technology cannot replace human contact: MGNREGA is not just about providing jobs, but also about fostering social capital. The scheme involves people coming together to work, interact, and build relationships. If technology is used to replace this human contact, the entire objective of MGNREGA can be nullified.
• Technology cannot address all issues: MGNREGA is a complex scheme that involves many challenges such as the need for timely payments, the quality of work done, and the monitoring of implementation. While technology can help with some of these issues, it cannot be a panacea.
• Technology can be misused: There is a risk that the use of technology can lead to corruption and misuse of funds. This can further exacerbate inequalities and negate the objective of MGNREGA.

In conclusion, while technology can be useful in improving the implementation of MGNREGA, it cannot be seen as a replacement for the human element of the scheme. Policymakers must ensure that the use of technology is balanced and does not undermine the core objectives of MGNREGA.