How does the use of state power against opposition protests affect the quality of democracy in India?

The use of state power against opposition protests, such as the reported excessive force against MGNREGA protesters, raises important concerns about the functioning of democracy in India. Democracy thrives on the principles of dissent, public participation, and respect for fundamental rights. When the state acts against peaceful protests, it can have several implications for the quality of democracy.

• Impact on Public Trust:
  • Excessive use of force can erode citizens’ trust in government institutions.
  • People may perceive the state as intolerant to criticism, leading to alienation and cynicism.
• Effect on Political Participation:
  • Fear of repression can discourage citizens from expressing their views or participating in protests.
  • This can lead to a decline in civic engagement and weaken the culture of active citizenship.
• Shrinking Democratic Space:
  • Frequent clampdowns on protests can limit the space available for opposition voices and civil society.
  • It undermines the right to freedom of speech and assembly, which are essential for a vibrant democracy.
• Weakening of Accountability:
  • Suppressing protests reduces opportunities for the government to be held accountable by the public.
  • Lack of accountability can lead to arbitrary decision-making and misuse of power.
• Polarization and Social Tensions:
  • Harsh actions against protesters can deepen divisions between the state and certain sections of society.
  • This can fuel resentment, polarization, and even unrest, which are detrimental to social harmony.