How does the Supreme Court's intervention influence the restoration of protected areas like Corbett Tiger Reserve?
The Supreme Court has made Uttarakhand responsible for restoring and repairing the Corbett Tiger Reserve. I want to understand how such judicial directions can impact the actual conservation efforts on the ground.
The Supreme Court of India plays a crucial role in the protection and restoration of ecologically sensitive areas such as the Corbett Tiger Reserve. Through its interventions, the Court ensures that the government and concerned authorities uphold environmental laws and take concrete actions for conservation.
- Legal Accountability: The Supreme Court's directions make state governments and agencies legally accountable for the protection and restoration of protected areas. Non-compliance can lead to contempt proceedings, compelling authorities to act swiftly.
- Time-bound Actions: The Court often sets specific deadlines for restoration and repair, ensuring that conservation measures are not indefinitely delayed due to bureaucratic inertia.
- Monitoring and Reporting: Judicial orders usually require regular progress reports and monitoring by independent bodies or expert committees, increasing transparency and oversight in the implementation of conservation efforts.
- Halt to Destructive Activities: The Supreme Court can order a stop to illegal constructions, mining, or other activities that harm the protected area, thus preventing further environmental degradation.
- Strengthening Conservation Laws: Court interventions often lead to stricter interpretation and enforcement of existing wildlife and forest protection laws, and sometimes to the formulation of new guidelines for better management.
- Public Awareness: High-profile judicial interventions bring national attention to conservation issues, encouraging greater public participation and support for environmental protection.
Answered
9 hours ago