How does the Supreme Court view the plea by Zakir Naik seeking clubbing of FIRs as a fugitive
Analyze the response of the Supreme Court to Zakir Naik's plea for clubbing of FIRs while being a fugitive.
The Supreme Court has rejected Zakir Naik's plea seeking the clubbing of FIRs while he remains a fugitive from Indian law. Here is an analysis of the response by the Supreme Court:
- The court emphasized that Zakir Naik, being a fugitive, cannot avail himself of the legal process while evading arrest or being outside the country.
- The court stated that Zakir Naik cannot dictate the terms and conditions of legal proceedings from a foreign land.
- By dismissing the plea, the Supreme Court reinforced the principle that individuals accused of crimes cannot dictate the legal process especially when they are absconding from the law.
Answered
6 months ago