How does the Supreme Court view the appointment of Deputy Chief Ministers by States in India
The Supreme Court finds that States do not violate the Constitution in the appointment of Deputy Chief Ministers.
- The Supreme Court of India has held that the appointment of Deputy Chief Ministers by states does not violate the Indian Constitution.
- The Court has clarified that the Constitution does not prohibit the appointment of a Deputy Chief Minister and that it is within the jurisdiction of the states to make such appointments.
- The Court has reiterated that the appointment of a Deputy Chief Minister does not undermine the position of the Chief Minister and is merely an arrangement made by the state government for efficient functioning.
- The Court has also held that the appointment of a Deputy Chief Minister does not violate the principles of federalism as enshrined in the Constitution, as long as it does not interfere with the distribution of powers between the state and central governments.
- Ultimately, the Supreme Court has taken the view that the appointment of Deputy Chief Ministers is a policy decision of the states and does not infringe upon the constitutional framework of India.
Answered
a year ago