How does the judiciary balance individual rights and national security during high-profile riot cases?

The Supreme Court is hearing bail pleas of activists involved in the Delhi riots case. I want to understand how the courts ensure justice while also considering issues like public order and national security.
In high-profile riot cases, such as those related to the Delhi riots, the judiciary faces the complex task of protecting individual rights while also safeguarding national security and maintaining public order. Courts must ensure that justice is delivered fairly, without compromising the safety and stability of society.
  • Constitutional Safeguards: The judiciary upholds fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution, such as the right to life and personal liberty (Article 21), even during cases involving national security concerns.
  • Due Process of Law: Courts ensure that accused individuals receive a fair trial, legal representation, and are not subjected to arbitrary detention, as mandated by legal procedures.
  • Scrutiny of Evidence: The judiciary examines the evidence presented by investigative agencies to ensure that charges are not based on flimsy or fabricated grounds. Bail is considered if the evidence does not justify prolonged detention.
  • Balancing Test: Courts weigh the seriousness of the allegations (such as incitement to violence or terrorism) against the rights of the accused. If national security is genuinely at risk, stricter measures may be justified, but not at the cost of fundamental rights.
  • Judicial Review: Actions of the executive and police are subject to judicial review. The courts can strike down or modify orders that violate constitutional rights or appear excessive.
  • Guidelines and Precedents: The Supreme Court and High Courts have laid down guidelines for granting bail in cases involving public order and security, ensuring that detention is not used as a punitive tool without trial.
  • Transparency: Courts often conduct hearings in open court, allowing media and public scrutiny, which acts as a check on arbitrary actions by authorities.
Answered a day ago
Rahul Aspirants