How does government-ordered blocking of media handles affect freedom of expression in a democracy?

In a democracy, freedom of expression is a fundamental right that allows individuals and media organizations to share opinions, report news, and hold the government accountable. When the government orders the blocking of media handles, such as those of reputed organizations like Reuters, it raises important questions about the balance between national security and the right to free speech.

• Chilling Effect on Free Speech: Blocking media handles can discourage journalists and citizens from expressing critical views, fearing censorship or legal action.
• Transparency and Accountability: Media acts as a watchdog. Blocking their platforms can reduce transparency and limit public scrutiny of government actions.
• Access to Information: Citizens rely on diverse sources for news. Blocking reputable media reduces access to unbiased information and may promote misinformation.
• Legal Safeguards: While the government can restrict speech for reasons like national security or public order (as per Article 19(2) of the Indian Constitution), such actions must be reasonable, necessary, and proportionate.
• International Image: Frequent blocking of global media can harm a country’s democratic credentials and affect its reputation in the international community.
• Judicial Oversight: Lack of proper judicial review or transparency in the blocking process can lead to misuse of power and arbitrary censorship.