How do judicial proceedings in cases like the 1984 anti-Sikh riots impact public trust in the legal system?

The 1984 anti-Sikh riots were a major communal tragedy in India, leading to widespread violence and loss of life. Judicial proceedings in such sensitive and high-profile cases play a crucial role in shaping public perception of the legal system. The way these cases are handled can either strengthen or weaken people's trust in justice.

• Delay in Justice: Prolonged trials and delayed verdicts, as seen in many riot-related cases, often create frustration and a sense of injustice among victims and society.
• Perceived Impunity: When influential individuals, like politicians or public figures, are seen to evade punishment or face delayed accountability, it reinforces a belief that the legal system favors the powerful.
• Witness Protection and Evidence: Lack of adequate protection for witnesses and poor evidence collection can lead to acquittals, further eroding public faith in the judiciary’s ability to deliver fair outcomes.
• Symbolic Verdicts: Occasional convictions, even after decades, can restore some faith, but are often viewed as too little, too late, especially if the majority of accused go unpunished.
• Media and Public Discourse: High-profile statements and media coverage keep public attention on these cases, increasing scrutiny of judicial actions and influencing perceptions of transparency and fairness.
• Impact on Minority Communities: Slow or inadequate judicial response in communal violence cases can make minority communities feel marginalized and insecure, leading to loss of trust in the system’s impartiality.
• Reform and Accountability: Such cases highlight the need for judicial reforms, better investigation, and accountability, which are essential for restoring and maintaining public trust.