How did the Supreme Court respond to the plea to mandate doctors to specify drugs' side effects
The Supreme Court dismissed the plea to mandate doctors to specify drugs' side effects to patients.
- The Supreme Court emphasized that it is the duty of healthcare professionals to provide necessary information about the drugs being prescribed to the patients.
- They stated that doctors should already be informing patients about potential side effects and risks associated with the medication.
- The Court highlighted the importance of informed consent in medical treatment, which includes understanding the potential benefits and risks of the prescribed drugs.
- The justices concluded that mandating doctors to specify every possible side effect for each medication could be impractical and burdensome, considering the extensive list of potential side effects for many drugs.
- They suggested that patients should actively engage with their healthcare providers and ask relevant questions about their medications to ensure they have a complete understanding of their treatment.
Answered
5 months ago