How did the Supreme Court interpret the bail provision under PMLA in the case of Jharkhand CM’s close aide
Supreme Court's ruling emphasized the bail as a norm and imprisonment as an exception in the PMLA case.
- The Supreme Court interpreted the bail provision under PMLA in the case of Jharkhand CM's close aide by emphasizing bail as a norm and imprisonment as an exception.
- The ruling highlighted that personal liberty is a fundamental right and cannot be denied easily.
- It emphasized that economic offences like money laundering should not be equated with heinous crimes like murder or terrorism.
- The Court's decision aimed to strike a balance between the interests of investigating agencies and the rights of the accused.
- It underlined the necessity of considering individual circumstances before denying bail, ensuring that incarceration is not automatic in PMLA cases.
Answered
8 months ago