How did the Supreme Court address the issue of 'serious charges' related to bail opposition by the State

1. The Supreme Court acknowledged that serious charges can be a valid reason for the State to oppose bail requests. 2. The Court emphasized that the mere presence of serious charges should not automatically lead to denial of bail. 3. It was clarified that the gravity of the offense alone is not enough to refuse bail; other factors must also be considered. 4. The Court highlighted the need for a balanced approach, ensuring that the accused's right to liberty is not unjustly denied based solely on the severity of the charges.

• Supreme Court recognized serious charges as a valid reason for bail opposition by the State.
• Emphasized that seriousness of charges should not be the sole factor in denying bail.
• Court stressed the importance of considering other relevant factors in bail decisions.
• Advocated for a balanced approach to safeguard accused's right to liberty.