How did former SC Judge Nariman describe the secularism aspect in the Ayodhya Verdict
Describe the sentiment expressed by former SC Judge Nariman regarding the treatment of secularism in the Ayodhya Verdict.
Former SC Judge Nariman expressed disappointment in the Ayodhya Verdict regarding the treatment of secularism in the following ways:
- He criticized the judgment for not upholding secularism as envisaged in the Constitution.
- He pointed out that the verdict failed to distinguish between secularism and the equality of all religions before the law.
- Nariman felt that the judgment lacked a definitive statement on secularism, which is a core principle of the Indian Constitution.
- He emphasized the importance of maintaining the secular fabric of the country in all legal judgments, especially those concerning religious matters.
- Nariman's sentiment underscores the need for upholding secular values and principles in all aspects of governance and decision-making.
Answered
5 months ago