How could virtual-only Supreme Court hearings impact access to justice and the environment?

The Chief Justice of India is considering making Supreme Court hearings virtual-only due to pollution. I want to understand the broader effects of such a shift on both the legal system and environmental health.
The move towards virtual-only Supreme Court hearings is being considered in response to severe pollution levels, but it also reflects broader trends in technology adoption within the judiciary. This shift can have significant implications for both access to justice and environmental sustainability.
    Impact on Access to Justice:
  • Increased Accessibility: Virtual hearings can make it easier for lawyers and litigants from remote areas to participate in proceedings without needing to travel to Delhi, reducing geographical barriers.
  • Cost and Time Efficiency: Parties save on travel and accommodation expenses, making litigation more affordable and efficient.
  • Digital Divide Concerns: Those without reliable internet access or digital literacy may face challenges, potentially excluding marginalized groups from effective participation.
  • Transparency and Public Access: Virtual hearings can be streamed online, increasing transparency and public engagement with the judicial process.
  • Technical Challenges: Connectivity issues, software glitches, and cybersecurity risks may disrupt proceedings and affect the quality of justice delivery.
    Impact on the Environment:
  • Reduced Carbon Footprint: Fewer people traveling to the Supreme Court (especially by air and road) means less vehicular pollution and lower greenhouse gas emissions.
  • Decreased Urban Congestion: Lower footfall in Delhi can help reduce traffic congestion and pressure on city infrastructure.
  • Resource Conservation: Virtual hearings reduce the need for physical paperwork, saving paper and other office resources.
  • Energy Consumption: Increased use of digital infrastructure may raise electricity demand, but overall environmental impact is likely lower compared to in-person hearings.
Answered 11 hours ago
Saurabh Aspirants