Does the electoral bonds scheme discriminate against smaller parties, according to a plea filed in the SC
A review plea has been filed in the SC against the same-sex marriage judgment.
- The electoral bonds scheme has faced criticism for allegedly discriminating against smaller parties. The plea filed in the Supreme Court argues that the scheme gives an unfair advantage to large political parties who are likely to receive a majority of the donations.
- The scheme allows for the issuance of bonds that can be purchased by individuals or corporations to donate to political parties. However, the identity of the donor remains anonymous, which raises concerns about transparency and potential misuse of funds.
- Smaller parties argue that they are at a disadvantage because large parties have more access to donors and are more likely to receive significant donations through the electoral bond system.
- Furthermore, the lack of disclosure regarding the donors' identities makes it difficult to track whether there is any undue influence or quid pro quo involved in the process.
- The review plea filed against the same-sex marriage judgment is unrelated to the electoral bonds scheme. It is a separate legal challenge questioning the validity and implications of the ruling.
Answered
a year ago